翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Boarding House Groonen ・ Board of Control for Lunacy and Mental Deficiency ・ Board of Deputies of British Jews ・ Board of directors ・ Board of Ecclesiastical Commissioners ・ Board of Economic Warfare ・ Board of Editors in the Life Sciences ・ Board of education ・ Board of Education Act 1899 ・ Board of Education Building ・ Board of Education Building (Philadelphia) ・ Board of Education for the City of York ・ Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet ・ Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell ・ Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley ・ Board of Education v. Earls ・ Board of Education v. Walters ・ Board of Equalization ・ Board of estimate ・ Board of Estimate of City of New York v. Morris ・ Board of European Students of Technology ・ Board of Examinations ・ Board of Extension of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South ・ Board of Finance ・ Board of First Fruits ・ Board of Fortifications ・ Board of governors ・ Board of Governors of the BBC ・ Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency ・ Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Board of Education v. Earls ： ウィキペディア英語版 Board of Education v. Earls ''Board of Education v. Earls'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the constitutionality of mandatory drug testing by public schools of students participating in extracurricular activities. The legal challenge to the practice was brought by two students, Lindsay Earls and Daniel James, and their families against the school board of Tecumseh, Oklahoma, alleging that their policy requiring students to consent to random urinalysis testing for drug use violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. ==Background== The Student Activities Drug Testing Policy adopted by the Tecumseh, Oklahoma School District (School District) requires all middle and high school students to consent to urinalysis testing for drugs in order to participate in any extracurricular activity. Two Tecumseh High School students and their parents brought suit, alleging that the policy violates the Fourth Amendment. The District Court granted the School District summary judgment. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that the policy violated the Fourth Amendment. The appellate court concluded that before imposing a suspicionless drug-testing program a school must demonstrate some identifiable drug abuse problem among a sufficient number of those tested, such that testing that group will actually redress its drug problem, which the School District had failed to demonstrate. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Board of Education v. Earls」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.